Ayn Rand saw collectivism in all its forms as an impediment to human rights. “The good of society” cannot be the basis of rights, since society is merely a collection of individuals, and so the only proper rights are individual rights.  When we base rights on what is good for society, that begs the question:  Who speaks for society?  Throughout history, such people who claim to speak for society inevitably turn out to be tyrants. You have a few, even a single person, deciding what is good for the people.  Rand thought that people ought to decide for themselves, based upon rational self-interest.

While on the subject of rational self-interest, John Locke had this to say:

“Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance to the commands of the civil magistrate; we are all qualified, entitled, and morally obliged to evaluate the conduct of our rulers. This political judgment, moreover, is not simply or primarily a right, but like self-preservation, a duty to God. As such it is a judgment that men cannot part with according to the God of Nature. It is the first and foremost of our inalienable rights without which we can preserve no other.” ~ John Locke

To listen to the podcast, click here.

If you like that episode, you make like Ayn Rand on Racism, from a couple weeks ago.

Thanks for listening!

J.P. Mac

p.s.: If you like the episode, please give it a generous rating with your podcast provider. Thnx! -JPM